If the Senate Bill clearly isn't going to pass will Bush immediately stop the 'enforcement show'?

Will we let him?

"It seems that the overreaching of amnesty advocates has politicized a lot of people, and not just conservatives, over the non-enforcement of the immigration law. And that’s a good thing too — if the White House concludes that amnesty is unattainable, there will be a strong temptation to end the enforcement show that’s been staged over the past six months or so, with workplace raids designed to bolster the administration’s credibility on the issue. A vigilant citizenry will be required to ensure that doesn’t happen."

http://www.cbsnews.com/stories/2007/06/0...

Answer:
I wouldn't put it past W to use a signing statement to further his goals of turning this country into a amnesty heaven.
We must also draw attention to the fact that the illegals mostly from Mexico, are just not getting up one morning and deciding to sneak across the borders, they are aided and abetted by the Mexican govt, the elite, and the drug cartel.
More than likely the drug cartel are the Mexican govt and elite. We put so much emphasis on the illegals we need to look at the big picture and speak to the drug issues are well
The major reason that everyone hates the amnesty is two reasons:

1. Language barrier between illegals and legal residents.
2. Social programs would be harmed by adding over 12 million people that no doubt will use if not all ready receiving government aid.

The most diverse free country in the world The United Arab Emirates has more people from all over the world building its cities up. There is no cry over this because:
1. They are guest workers that are going back to their host country someday
2. They are allowed to live and do business in certain zones and not all around.
3. They don't have a welfare state that grants benefits to everyone
4. Most foreigners speak English, especially the original Arab Emirate citizens. There are many languages spoken, but English and Arabic are the two primary ones.

If we were to get rid of social handouts and secure the border, then we could allow as many Mexicans, Central Americans, and other nationals in and grant instant citizenship as long as they pass a background check, speak English, and don't get into trouble for 6 months. There would not be too much worry about this issue, if we had a secure border and allowed everyone who meets the criteria. Language is the first barrier. Ever hear of a bunch of Canadians placing the Maple leaf flag at used car dealerships and demanding bilingual French education and other rights? No, then problem solved.
Well..after hearing about LA wanting federal funds to help with the gang problems...even though they're a sanctuary city....I don't know how much longer he can ignore enforcing something. I know I plan to keep riding till I see a fence up and then some.

The Immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness.


More Immigration Questions and Answers ...
  • Would you let a thief that broke into your home stay?
  • I have US/UK dual citizenship, which countries can I work in?
  • What do you think about immigrants stepping up to the plate in time of war?
  • How can americans not know about anti-illegal rallies all across the country?
  • Isn't the immigration problem fed by American companies?
  • [Q1] - are you really British? or you're an immigrant?
  • In terms of immigration should we reestablish institutions such as Hull House?
  • How many Mexicans are actually of Aztecan Ancestry?
  • Is America being taken over by a new form of TERRORISTS?
  • Mortgage recident perment visa?