Is it possible that Bush sent more troops to Iraq overiding Congress as part of an advance plan?

Did Bush want to get more of the military out of the states before attempting to give our country to the illegals?
Congress did not want to send more troops and Bush refused to listen to them or public opinion.
Does this give possible proof that he has sold out the citizens of our country to our enemies; while ensuring that Congress would have no legal military force large enough to be effective if hostilities do break out between illegals and citizens?

Answer:
I don't he's smart enough to think in such a circular fashion. I think you are far more intelligent to envision such a possibility. I think he is more like a spoiled brat who JUST HAS TO HAVE his way.
As for no force capable if hostilities break out...I don't know the exact numbers, but the citizens of this country are armed, peacefully for the most part. We use guns for hunting, protection. If the police couldn't handle it or the national guard, the people would. Such a scenario would be worst-case.
Interesting question. We still have more than sufficient troops here for a military reaction in an emergency.

Possible, yes. Likely? No.

This is NOT a seditious question. Very interesting area to explore. You aren't spreading rumors, just asking questions.

I would disagree with you on "Bush refused to listen to them or public opinion." He listened, then chose otherwise. It may even been his duty to do so. We can't run the country by democracy until our educational system is fixed, and the proper laws are passed. It isn't Congresses decision whether to send troops. It IS their decision to fund or not to fund them. They chose to fund them, so Congress has done the same as he. They might know something you don't.
I think Bush assumed Republicans would remain in power. I don't think he foresaw a shift.

I think the surge was partly to spite voters, and also to show that he had a plan. he wasn't going to listen to the democrats, but the election did wake him up.
Once again, the blame Bush thing and the issue of more troops. It was VOTED on, that is why they were sent, so blame ALL that voted for it. As for as the illegals, at least they did get MORE public input. Now, guess you will blame Bush for all of this also, when it was actually a KENNEDY Amnesty Bill, and Bush and McCain jumped on the Kennedy Bandwagon, start with blaming Kennedy. There are MORE Dems who voted to pass this bill than Repubs, so why do we not put All the Blame on All the Ones who Voted for things that we do not like, instead of One Person. They are as*holes on both sides of the place. As for as needing the US military, being used in a Illegal Criminals and US Citizens situation, there are other Law Enforcements Agencies , by the thousands that can handle it. Or just let the US citizens handle it, and it will over faster than you can say 911. Because this situation could be handled as fast as a Ant Eater in a ant bed, if given opportunity.

The Immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness.


More Immigration Questions and Answers ...
  • What is expected of you, if are to sponsor some one to immigrate abroad?
  • Should illegal immigrants be allowed to sue their employers?
  • Hey! i live in the UNITED STATES and want to move to BRAZIL! Help Please!?
  • What U.S. city has the most salvadoran residents?
  • Foiled immigration bill OR attention deflector?
  • Do ppl think just because the immigration bill died the issue is over?
  • How have the Arabs in Dearborn positively influenced Southeast Michigan?
  • Illegals-Why do you deserve american citizenship?
  • Since pelosi dosn't want us to have guns how about a public stoning?
  • BUSH Signed an Executive Order that SOLVES ILLEGAL IMMIGRATION?