Although my English isn't good but Do you know the deference between the two?
Answer:
I can fully accept that a lot of other countries take their responsibilities of accepting asylum seekers, but unfortunately for us, most want to come here and if we are being honest we all know why. Free health care, free education, free welfare free housing and family allowance and unemployment payments. This is not being racist, but this is reality, and until we fall in line with the rest of the European countries things wont change for the UK.
and we are fulfilling our obligation.
yes i do know the difference, an asylum seeker has been through the correct legal procedures u say are our obligation & an illegal has not, and they are the people causing the confusion.
P.S I think your english is fine :)
A simple answer regarding asylum seekers - Go to the nearest political stable country to the one said person would be fleeing from. As a UK citizen it puzzles me how we recieve asylum seekers from the other side of the planet. How many perfectly pleasant countries have you been through before you got here"? i would say.
And the one things are going the term "asylum seeker" really seems to refer to anyone that is looking for a better/easier life somewhere else. e.g the mass exodus of populus from Africa into southern Europe.
With the massive global media and western ways of life being shown to every tribal herdman in the far reaches of the globe, they are being shown a life of supposed luxury - nothing short of a land where "the streets are paved with Gold".
We are also obliged to look after our own old sick and poor, we will not be able to look after anyone
The immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness