Should there be an Amnesty for Asylum Seekers in UK 2007?
Answer:
Definitely not!
No chance deport them all....!!!
no
indeed
No. There should be a total block on them until this government can work out how many there actually are in the UK.
No we are already full up !!!!
Yes of course poor things they deserve it no matter where they are!
THERE SHOULD BE AN AMNESTY IN UK 2007
i feel this is a racist question. but i agree the situation needs sorting.
No way!! Hell No!! and it's do'gooders like you who are destroying this country coming up with stupid ideas like this.. get these parasites and all who support them out of here. asap.
There should be stricter regulations actually, only allowing people here where there is a sufficiant skills shortage ie doctors, dentists, we never know the full background of each person applying, it may also help to get a fuller idea if we knew how many immigrants are being accepted by our european buddies. It's not a racist question just a common sense question regarding how many other people we can cater for before our infrastructure crumbles and the economy suffers, for instance here in my city we are taking trained Police off the streets and replacing with less experienced community support officers, but last year here we spent over £100k on translators for the police regarding issues with the 98 different nationalities we have in this city, NOW that's the salary for 3 fully trained police officers? It's a tough topic, the government say more people = more tax paid but who knows?
No Way. more like lets have a crack down on Asylum Seekers.in 2007.. the UK tax payer will be only too happy to pay for their return flight home.. sooner there is a proper Army Border Patrol in Britain the better..that might deter them..
No they shouldn't be allowed to claim asylum in the first place.
No way, it would be tolerable if there was only a few, but there are thousands and that just an estimated guess by the establishment, so in reality ther are even more. If you came here as an illegal immigrant, then you should expect the consequences of it. Might make more sense to put a stop to all immigration until we put our house in order.
Why is this question racist?? An amnesty would not work because how would you get the details too the people that could use it they almost all don't speak English so how?
It's time for the overpaid power mad politicians to stop sitting in their ivory towers and deal with the issues that their pathetic immigration polices have caused.
Britain is quite rightly a melting pot for all people as long as they want to contribute to our society then no problem but letting people who are criminals and drug addicts into our country well I despair the sooner we get a stronger government the better!!
Why? they come and go has they like anyway .Shall we change this countries name to Open Door? Cause the Name the United Kingdom is so Meaningless .The name sounds like a Walt Disney Cartoon .And they all went to the land they call the United kingdom And lived Happily ever Afterwards.Why has the name been changed via the back door.Yet when people go from this Country to other coutries they are called Britts .Never United Kingdomers So stupid I rest my case
No we must crank down and deport
No there should not.
no
I just knew that somewhere in the answers given,some macrocephalous idiot would suggest that this question is racist.How can keeping a check on people coming in to this country be anything but sound common sense? To declare a total amnesty on all asylum seekers without even checking their reasons for wanting to come here in the first place would not only be lunacy beyond belief, it would be an absolute gift to terrorists.How on Earth can self preservation possibly be racist?.I know there are countless thousands of British people of all faiths, colours and creeds ,many among my closest friends ,who agree with me.
Asylum seekers are not illegal immigrants. They are people in need. To get permission to stay they have to show they are at risk of being killed if they return. If they can't show that, they can't stay. So theres no need for an amnesty.
There is a need for each country to be fair and help our fellow human beings who are victioms of war or political unrest.
Where would we go if we were in their shoes? It happened in Yugoslavia for gods sake, it can happen anywhere.
I have no problem with genuine asylum seekers. Most of the ones I've met are in shock and mourning, and just want the political situation in their country fixed so they can go home.
no why should we
TOO RITE
I think they should just close the gates as they say
what do you think it took me 3 months to get a new job after the factory where i worked at got shut down
every where where i went was full of polish i think that this is a ******* joke...........
No.
No under no circumstances, we let these people in and they take advantage of everything our forefathers have worked for and use our own rules against us
No way, send them all home, no excuses.
simply put NO
Never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never, never.
And in case I missed anything out, NEVER!
Lawyer can you please enable receiving messages from other users, i need to talk with you ,you can click on my user name to send me a message
NO, there should none.
Yes there should be an amnesty for assylum seekers and illegal immigrant,if there is no need for help they wouldnt ask.one good turn deserves another and you never can predict what will happen to anybody,its Britain time to help foreigners and it could be foreigners turn tomorrow to help Britain,Do good because of tomorrow you thats in better situation today,you can never tell what will become of you tomorrow.
freedom for illegal immigrant.
No What they should do is tell them to turn up at heathrow
for a bonus and the bonus is a plane ticket anywhere in the world
Most are economic migrants and those who are not would be given help
The immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness