Is it right to blame every indian for involvment in glasgow accident?
Answer:
Accident ?
Looked pretty much on purpose to me.
And as for indians, never saw the cowbows neither.
Considering that Indians had absolutely nothing to do with it, no, not really.
Of course it isn't. The only ones to blame are those that were involved.
No, not all Muslims are terrorists.
No theres good and bad in all walks of life,,,,,,,
No, just Islamic ones!
1) No, every Indian should not be blamed as the issue has been created by a person not by a nation.
2) Indians are not known to have terrorist mentalities. It is a peace loving nation with a respect for all religions.
It is infact gross to blame every Indian for this.
accident? Indian?
what happened was some deluded fanatic deliberately tried to horribly murder as many people as possible, fortunately he failed in his mission.
you can however blame every single person who has played any race/ discrimination card or supported those who do-we are now reaping the seeds sown by the mamby- pamby, chattering classes who support civil libertarianism and human rights without pausing to think . we are all equal and deserve equality, and not the Orwellian animal farm equality they wish to foist upon us
It's never right to blame any race or religion for the actions of a few. There's bad apples in every bunch.
I'm a christian & cringe every time I'm blamed generically for the crusades, inquisition & slavery. None of my ancestors took part in the first 2 & considering they were coal miners they were technically slaves themselves. But as a christian I do feel the need & have the right to condemn their actions. Silence is the same as condoning. As once said all it takes for evil to prevail is for good men (women) to do nothing.
I have friends in every race, color & religion imaginable & would never even think of blaming them for what a relative did, let alone those they didn't even know that were just the same color, creed or religion.
It's human nature at first to do it, to be able to direct the anger at a target. But if it continues after things calm down some it becomes no more than bigotry with an excuse (notice I said excuse, not reason). There is never a reason for bigotry.
Accidents do happen,but medical people who deliberately
try to murder and injure people and young children, throw a very dark shadow over there race
Ties and trust that have been formed with people of different cultures have been sorely tested and found wanting in our trust of Asians.I would say that our trust is at a very low point and suspicion is now pointed in there direction.The only way to restore trust is people and Muslims must report and give these terrorist over to the police,they have not done this so how can we trust people who harbour such renegades of a
civilised country.
Well if they were making a political point with the backing of the majority of the Indian population then blaming every indian for glasgow accident would be reasonable comment. But unfortunately it did NOT happen that way.
Regards
The reason why these problem will never be solved is because people like you lot don't even know WHERE THE PROBLEM is!!
The car bombers were a mix of Iraqi's, Palestinians and Indians. The only thing that connects them are that they are **MUSLIM**
India has been fighting Islamic terrorism before most of you were even born! How do you think Pakistan was created?
Its nothing to do with the Indians, it was Iraqis or muslims that were involved.
Ethnic minorities have formed what amount to closed societies in many towns and cities within Britain and refuse to integrate with their local communities. This could be in direct response to prejudice, which Britain cannot deny has been its traditional treatment of many immigrant groups. Ask any Irishman or first-generation West Indian living here whether or not that is true. Trouble is, though, that this isolationist policy, whether for self-protection or the maintenance of non-British cultural practices, is now working to inflame racial abuse and worse.
Many "home-grown" Brits see these closed communities as being willing to hide and nurture those whose aim is to inflict death, injury and damage on this country. It is therefore little wonder that all the residents within those communities are viewed with suspicion, no matter how many condemnations and denials of terrorist involvement are made by social leaders and representatives. If you'll pardon the pun, many people in the UK are no longer prepared to accept your leaders' or representatives' words in good faith because be it through fear of reprisals, resentment of past injustices (real or perceived) or just downright bloody-mindedness, the fact remains that closed communities and so-called "no-go areas" do and will continue to provide a smokescreen for those who would tarnish your races' and faiths' reputations by their mindless actions.
Integration is the key to greater trust and, in light of what's happening these days vis a vis terrorist attacks, the onus is on the closed communities to drop the barriers and permit an unobstructed view of the minds and natures of the people who live within them.
Yes, integration would most certainly have some diluting effect as far as cultural identity is concerned, but if that is unacceptable then the question has to be asked: Are you sure your continued presence is the right thing for you? Liberalism does have its place and a value in certain situations. There's the old saying, "when in Rome..." but the Romans had this knack of recognising the good points about those within their empire and of adopting and promoting those activities and beliefs. It's why they adopted a religion that has, as one of its Commandments "Thou shalt not kill". Thus, Rome did not entirely impose its culture on those living within its empire; it assimilated the better and often more enlightened and civilised aspects of those cultures.
We cannot evaluate or assimilate that which is kept hidden from us and, I'm afraid, the barriers that have been erected by the immigrant communities are a major cause of the universal blame that you complain about.
It is Muslims who did it- whenever you hear the names MOhammed,Khan , Shafiq , Abdullah , Sulaman, etc you know they are of Pakistani or Somalian origin-in other words Islamic .
Indian people have a real loathing for Pakistanis ,they hate them more than most people in the west..the reason being they give them a bad name--never has the phrase "tarring everyone with the same brush" been more apt.
Remember ,if it says Halal-stay TFA.
******* right it is
It doesn't matter whether you are an Indian or not, justice should be given to those victims and just punishment should be awarded to those who are involved.
not again! for gods sake were not at war with the muslims, look at the whites in britian muggings killings etc, are all whites to blame for all wrong doings? p.s i'm no fan of them but this is getting ridiculas
If you mean Muslim no it is not right to blame all of them.
YES because they do not codem or say anything . Just Silence that means to us they suport the incident/
The Indians involved in the Glasgow incident were from a minority group. They were Indian muslims. Every country has its muslim problem.
No it isn't right espesially now that for the FIRST time the Indian and Muslim community have publically condemnded the actions of the minority causing the mayhem.And when they continue condemning and probably go even further we just may become a true one nation but people of ALL nationallities have to get their heads out of the sand
No not at all, I have heard it said "only" 2% of Muslims are potential terrorists or helpers of terrorism. Many Indians are Muslims.
Please note 2% of the UK's 1.6 million Muslims is 32,000
(2% of 1,6 million = 32,000)
I think it is a mistake to move millions of people from old political/religious ideologies like Islam to the west. No "racism" intended Islam is a religious/political doctrine NOT a race.
The Immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness.
More Immigration Questions and Answers ...