Isn't illegal immigration really Third World Colonization of America?
Some may say that Europe and the US colonized other lands. However, the fact is, that they gave those "colonized lands" running water, helped develop food and crops, supplied medical aid, facilitated economic prosperity for the indigenous and so on. Third world colonization brings once-eradicated disease, street gangs, lawlessness, breakdown in order, corruption, etc.
Answer:
not just "illegal" but ALL new Third World Immigration predominately from Islamic/Horn of Africa and Latin America. Absolutely colonization. These immigrants are using (abusing) the Democratic process to change your country in their favor.(Yes one can democratically destroy/change a country) Just look at the Mayor of Los Angles. Hes an ELECTED representative of the Mexican colony of Los Angles. Do you think he has YOUR best interest at heart? NO WAY!! do you think he has illegal immigrants interest at heart? HELL YES! were in trouble people we need to act NOW!!
is the Iraq war really a "first" world colonization of the middle east?
Some may say that Europe and the US colonized other lands. However, the fact is, that they gave those "colonized lands" running water, helped develop food and crops, supplied medical aid, facilitated economic prosperity for the indigenous and so on. Third world colonization brings once-eradicated disease, street gangs, lawlessness, breakdown in order, corruption, ...i guess if you were one of the lucky one's that lived maybe you got what you consider a benifit
You are correct. Infiltrate, proliferate, and conquer.
TRUE.
More like an invasion. Look up the term "Reconquista".
It should be called "an invasion of IL-LEGALS that has the potential of turning AMERICA into a 3rd. world country!
Maybe with some schooling and some help, we can bring them up to our level,,,??
we are not allow to debate on this subject
and especially here in yahuu answer
yahuu is in violation of the first amendment
but they don't care
Freedom of religion, speech, press, and peaceable assembly as well as the right to petition the government.
Congress shall make no law respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the Government for a redress of grievances.
Why do you ask a question when you already give the answer to it also? You just want validation of your point of view, which is fine. So make a statement, this is what I believe, any opinions to the contrary? At any rate, thanks for the two points.
The Immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness.
More Immigration Questions and Answers ...
