Were Indians freed through the act of terrorism?
Answer:
British not tolerant toward muslims?
They make no effort to integrate into our society. They preach hatred toward us on street corners in their mosques and schools. They protect murderers and refuse to coopertate with the police.
Yet we continue to allow them into our country provide them with homes, the freedom to own business, education, health care.
And you call us intolerant. Sorry dude but I think you got things a bit cuonfused there.
I didn't know India wasn't free before.. More info would help on this one..
I believe Ghandi was a pacifist and deplored acts of violence.
we think you are a beautifully rich culture
India was colonized by the British, and became independent of Great Britain in the 1940's through peaceful (non-violent) means. Ghandi was instrumental in this process. There may have been sporatic violent acts, but it was the exception, not the rule.
I am from the US, and from my viewpoint, the British people are quite tolerant toward most people (including Muslims)
India was not 'freed' by any outside power. They 'revolted' against a superior force that invaded their country. The people who are committing acts of terrorism these days are just plain criminals who are resentful of a world they otherwise refuse to become part of. If you mean the U.S. when you wrote 'us' then I remind you that it was the 13 original colonies of Britain that revolted against unfair and unjust laws imposed them then. The U.S. and Britain are 'tolerant' of each other because, after all, we share the English language and many customs (and political views).
Even though 'Muslim' tends to be the religion of those manics who like to blow things up, not all Muslims are criminals. That's like jumping to the conclusion that all Germans during WW2 were Nazis!
India had a uniformed army that freed it from the Brits not a group of dirty nightshirted terrorist
The immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness