Has America turned into a bunch of whimps?

What other people would tolerate what American politicians do?

Aren't they supposed to represent the peoples' will?

Answer:
YES whimps and Pu$$y's
It is political correctness and it will destroy America
No, we are not wimps.

Do you expect any credible answers when you have a picture of Miss Piggy with a breast showing?
Not wimps but divided. If people could somehow pull together, we could end the illegal invasion of the USA for good.
watch out ....you will be labled a complainer or a racist.....frustration sucks dont it
ur counrty sucks
Anyone would compared to what their Polititians do......like behead you if you complain......send you to a slave camp

Compared to the options...our system looks pretty good
Dude I like your avatar but you spelled wimp wrong. Also, stop being a big crybaby. You need to put the right people in power by voting. Read a little, watch the news, and educate yourself. Stop regurgitating other people's rhetoric and THINK FOR YOURSELF. Lastly, love it or leave it.
As a veteran, I'm pretty concerned that Canada or Mexico is gonna storm in and kick our butts while our forces are in the land-o-sand
IS THIS THE PEOPLES WILL ? IF IT IS THEN WE ARE DOING SOMETHING ABOUT IT.

"One way or the other, we are determined to deny Iraq the capacity to develop weapons of mass destruction and the missiles to deliver them. That is our bottom line."
President Clinton, Feb. 4, 1998.

"If Saddam rejects peace and we have to use force, our purpose is clear. We want to seriously diminish the threat posed by Iraq's weapons of mass destruction program."
President Clinton, Feb. 17, 1998.

"Iraq is a long way from [here], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risks that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face."
Madeline Albright, Feb 18, 1998.

"He will use those weapons of mass destruction again, as he has ten times since 1983."
Sandy Berger, Clinton National Security Adviser, Feb, 18, 1998

"[W]e urge you, after consulting with Congress, and consistent with the U.S. Constitution and laws, to take necessary actions (including, if appropriate, air and missile strikes on suspect Iraqi sites) to respond effectively to the threat posed by Iraq's refusal to end its weapons of mass destruction programs."
Letter to President Clinton, signed by Sens. Carl Levin, Tom Daschle, John Kerry, and others Oct. 9, 1998.

"Saddam Hussein has been engaged in the development of weapons of mass destruction technology which is a threat to countries in the region and he has made a mockery of the weapons inspection process."
Rep. Nancy Pelosi (D, CA), Dec. 16, 1998.

"Hussein has ... chosen to spend his money on building weapons of mass destruction and palaces for his cronies."
Madeline Albright, Clinton Secretary of State, Nov. 10, 1999.

"There is no doubt that . Saddam Hussein has reinvigorated his weapons programs. Reports indicate that biological, chemical and nuclear programs continue apace and may be back to pre-Gulf War status. In addition, Saddam continues to redefine delivery systems and is doubtless using the cover of a licit missile program to develop longer-range missiles that will threaten the United States and our allies."
Letter to President Bush, Signed by Sen. Bob Graham (D, FL,) and others, Dec, 5, 2001.

"We begin with the common belief that Saddam Hussein is a tyrant and a threat to the peace and stability of the region. He has ignored the mandate of the United Nations and is building weapons of mass destruction and the means of delivering them."
Sen. Carl Levin (d, MI), Sept. 19, 2002.

"We know that he has stored secret supplies of biological and chemical weapons throughout his country."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"Iraq's search for weapons of mass destruction has proven impossible to deter and we should assume that it will continue for as long as Saddam is in power."
Al Gore, Sept. 23, 2002.

"We have known for many years that Saddam Hussein is seing and developing weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Ted Kennedy (D, MA), Sept. 27, 2002.

"The last UN weapons inspectors left Iraq in October1998. We are confident that Saddam Hussein retains some stockpiles of chemical and biological weapons, and that he has since embarked on a crash course to build up his chemical and biological warfare capabilities. Intelligence reports indicate that he is seeking nuclear weapons..."
Sen. Robert Byrd (D, WV), Oct. 3, 2002.

"I will be voting to give the President of the United States the authority to use force — if necessary — to disarm Saddam Hussein because I believe that a deadly arsenal of weapons of mass destruction in his hands is a real and grave threat to our security."
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Oct. 9, 2002.

"There is unmistakable evidence that Saddam Hussein is working aggressively to develop nuclear weapons and will likely have nuclear weapons within the next five years . We also should remember we have alway s underestimated the progress Saddam has made in development of weapons of mass destruction."
Sen. Jay Rockerfeller (D, WV), Oct 10, 2002,

"He has systematically violated, over the course of the past 11 years, every significant UN resolution that has demanded that he disarm and destroy his chemical and biological weapons, and any nuclear capacity. This he has refused to do."
Rep. Henry Waxman (D, CA), Oct. 10, 2002.

"In the four years since the inspectors left, intelligence reports show that Saddam Hussein has worked to rebuild his chemical and biological weapons stock, his missile delivery capability, and his nuclear program. He has also given aid, comfort, and sanctuary to terrorists, including al Qaeda members. It is clear, however, that if left unchecked, Saddam Hussein will continue to increase his capacity to wage biological and chemical warfare, and will keep trying to develop nuclear weapons."
Sen. Hillary Clinton (D, NY), Oct 10, 2002

"We are in possession of what I think to be compelling evidence that Saddam Hussein has, and has had for a number of years, a developing capacity for the production and storage of weapons of mass destruction. "[W]ithout question, we need to disarm Saddam Hussein. He is a brutal, murderous dictator, leading an oppressive regime ... He presents a particularly grievous threat because he is so consistently prone to miscalculation. And now he has continued deceit and his consistent grasp for weapons of mass destruction ... So the threat of Saddam Hussein with weapons of mass destruction is real ...
Sen. John F. Kerry (D, MA), Jan. 23. 2003
I beleive America has become a little timid over the years, before our time a king would say were going to war and thats the end of it. But now people are protesting war and saying it is bad. I also share that opinion, but I do think that we should take a nuke and end the war with the middle east.
If you don't like our country you don't have to be here. Countries that have tested our will in the past have met a terrible fate.
What other people would allow that pasty looking geriatric to turn the floor of the House into a friggin kintergarden? The democrats have truly reached a new low! Think about it,: Emanuel, Pelosi, Franks, Durbin, Kerry, Kennedy, Clinton, O'Donnell (Rosie), etc. etc.
and what have you done as yet? i have personally notified every politician what i want them to do "in my districts and state.
and have produced over 500 pamphlets of facts and where to turn in illegal aliens.
i have assisted protestors that demand illegal aliens deported
i have turned in countless illegal aliens to ice and those that hire them i have spoken with local police reguarding illegal aliens and am still demanding politicians allow local police to enforce immigration laws
To kd s:


LOL - yes, when we invade from Canada, we will force you to watch curling, because that's all we will allow on TV - save for some hockey, weather, and live coverage of the House of Commons.
No.

Why would anyone put a puppet in a seductive pose?

Bill w - bring it on. We might like curling...
No, it just seems like it because the whimps complain the loudest.
you know if illegals of any race do not like this country then you should stay out of it. It is the land of the free and if you don't like it tough. I believe that we should stop all illegals from entering this country. It is not the tax payers fault that the Mexican gov. sucks. Revolt down there, don't come here to America and complain about how things are not fair, when immigrants get more benefits than a homeless person that was born here in this great country. So quit your damn complaining. I saw one lady write nd wine about not getting any respect from Americans cause she is illegal, and that it is next to impossible to get citizenship. For I think that is the point. That way we don't end up harboring the many poor countries poor, and supporting them as we do the Mexicans who come here and get benefits.

Let the Fagandians come down here and get stomped on. There are plenty of armed citizens here who would love to kick some silly lil northerners butt. I know I would, and enjoy it. I am totally with I B on how our country will take down the opposition.

The immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness

  • Should undocumented immigrants be able to win American contests?
  • it seems to me that the our country is being used by easten europeans , is the trouble with the goverment?
  • International passport limit?
  • immigration to Canada?
  • What does my soon-to-be Mexican husband have to do to bring me to live in Mexico?
  • What would u think if u were a Mexican crossin the border?
  • I NEEDsome HELP!!?
  • Do illegal aliens have parental rights?
  • How do I resign as sponsor of an alien? My husband left me and I no longer wish to sponsor him. What can I do?
  • Indian Americans, which is better? PIO or OCI?