Don't you think the U.N should be in Washington DC?
Answer:
I think the UN should be dis-banned.
I would prefer it be in Baghdad in the worst neighborhood.
I think the UN should be in the Hudson..river, that is
no. not at all. it's purposefully not there because it would conflict with politics in DC.
I do think the UN should be on American soil and I don't think we should belong to this useless corrupt organization! I does nothing and never has....NOTHING!
I agree with Mahal...stick it Baghdad....or maybe France?
hell! there shouldnt even be no damn U.N.!!!!
No way. The UN is uterly useless when it comes to solving world affairs, there's got to be a better solution. But I'm not sure the US has it.
No they would bother Bush day and night
If by that you mean so that US gov't. officials won't have to travel to NY to exert their influence...perhaps.
"Should" really be on neutral ground.
I think Detroit, Michigan.
absolutely NOT. they're not our government, and hopefully never will be. they have zero business there.
hell if it were up to me, they'd be thrown out of NY as well. UN out of US!
I think the UN should be in Mexico, or Cuba, or anywhere else but the United States.
I think it should be in England. Or maybe Brussels.
I think the UN should be in Paris, France. They deserve each other.
The immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness