US Immigration Racist or Prejudice?
Answer:
Answer is in the question: 3rd world.
Less developed countries have less to offer, and more aplicants for immigration. It's particularly true of relatively short-duration visas. If a student comes from a developed nation like Japan to study in the US, he has less motivation to overstay that visa than does one from an underdeveloped nation like Poland. So the former will face less suspicion, than the latter, and thus the process won't seem as 'strict' to him.
Economic development, not race, is the issue. You could call that prejudice, if you like, since it's a matter of judging an individual by thier nation of origin, but it's not racism, as persons of the same basic 'race' can come from both developed and third-world countries.
Neither. We are actually one of the most lenient countries when it comes to immigration and no other sports the diversity we have.
show proof instead of writing nonsense!
How is illegal immigration a racist issue? It is based on LAWS, not race! BTW, Mexican is not a race!
You mean why do we give so many more of them to people from Mexico, Phillipines and Vietnam than from austrialia, england and Italy? I guess because the USA has tried to help out disadvantaged people.
because 3rd world countries bring poverty and disease
Or perhaps they're just more careful with areas of the world with higher crime rates and are conducting more in-depth background checks to ensure someone with a criminal background isn't trying to get into our country?
Doesn't sound racist or prejudice to me...sounds like a good idea.
Actually immigration law, biased to people who can contribute to society, such as doctors, nurses, and high tech workers.
I am guessing you are from 3rd world country and were turned down for a visa because you don't have marketable job skills.
is racist
They are not anymore strict, they just get better cooperation from those countries. They understand that we want to know who and why a person wants to enter our country and where they intend to go and what they intend to do. They don't take the atitude that if you want to enter, you just walk in, do as you damn well please and go where you want without any form of accounting to anyone.
in order to have a balanced diversity of people
Because immigrants from Australia, England, etc are less likely to become a burden for this country than people from craphole 3rd world countries.
Both! Racist and Prejudice!!!
Do you have proof for what you stated!Proof please
Where did you get that idea?,,,,from LA RAZA?
here is a link
look at the countries of origin
Bureau figures show the U.S. population grew by 2.8 million between July 1, 2004, and July 1, 2005. Hispanics accounted for 1.3 million of that increase. If current birth rate and immigration rates were to remain unchanged for another 60 to 70 years, US population would double to some 600 million people. Census statistics also show that 45% of children under age 5 are from a racial or ethnic minority.[6]
There were 1,266,264 immigrants who were granted legal residence in 2006, up from 601,516 in 1987, 849,807 in 2000, and 1,122,373 in 2005. Top twelve sending countries, by country of birth: Mexico - 173,753, China, People’s Republic - 87,345, Philippines - 74,607, India - 61,369, Cuba - 45,614, Colombia - 43,151, Dominican Republic - 38,069, El Salvador - 31,783, Vietnam - 30,695, Jamaica - 24,976, South Korea - 24,386, Guatemala - 24,146, Other countries - 606,370.[7] In fiscal year 2006, just 202 refugees from Iraq were allowed to resettle in the United States.[8][9]
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/immigration...
I don't see Australia, England, or Italy listed.
Where did you get your info?..please give a link.
I NEED A LAUGH
It might have to do with the fact that we already have a bunch of uneducated, low-skilled workers living in the US. The US is far more gernerous about allowing immigration than most countries. Having a population of 3rd worlders living in the US does not sustain the US economy. What is does is perpetuate a movement towards making the US a 3rd world nation. In the meantime, US taxpayers foot the bill for the 3rd world movement. There are far less people from Australia, England, and Italy trying to get into the US then people who are trying to get in from Mexico. People from Australia, England, and Italy don't need to come to the US as much as someone from Mexico, Philippines, Vietnam because their countries consist of people who actually made something of their country.
The Immigration information post by website user , MyTend.com not guarantee correctness.
More Immigration Questions and Answers ...